Total Knee Replacement at HSS: One Size Does Not Fit All

Richard S. Laskin, MD
Hospital for Special Surgery


Implants for total knee replacement

When total knee replacement was in its infancy in the early 1970s, the manufacturers of the implants offered the prostheses in very limited sizes. At surgery the patient’s bone had to be sculptured so as to fit the available sizes of implants. It rapidly became obvious, however, that a better scenario would be to have a variety of implant sizes that would come close to matching the patient’s anatomical situation. Also, it was obvious that sizing was more than just designing implants for tall or short patients, male or female patients, or even for thin or heavy patients.

Differences in implant size and shape

At present, all of the prosthetic implant companies offer knee prostheses in a variety of sizes. How were these sizes determined? Initially, designers studied the anatomy of normal femoral and tibial bones in the pathology laboratory. Subsequently, with the advent of CT scans, these were used to compile a database of the “standard” sizes and shapes of the bone of patients who were going to undergo knee replacement.

As a broad generality, women are smaller than men. Consequently, more female bones were studied for the smaller sizes of implants, while male bones were studied for the larger sizes. Obviously this was not an absolute: there are many short men, and likewise many tall women. There were also evaluations of the width and height of the joint surfaces that were used to determine implant sizes.

This method of designing implants is a good one as long as the “database” of CT scans or bones that are evaluated is representative of the patients that will be operated upon. There are subtle variations between various ethnic groups throughout the world. Therefore, the more diverse patient bones that are studied, the more valid is the database.

The result has been that all modern, reputable manufacturers of prostheses offer implants that cover over 98% of the sizes that we see in clinical practice. For those in the remaining 2%, a custom implant may be required.  This is very much akin to sizing for shoes. If your size is somewhere between 5A and 14D, you can probably buy a pair of shoes over the counter. If you lie beyond these “norms” (not meant in any pejorative sense), then you may need a custom product. 

Is there a downside to having a custom implant for each and every patient? Cost is obviously a consideration, but more than that, there is the potential error involved in fabricating any custom product.

Determining the proper implant size

Traditionally, the surgeon has used plastic overlay templates that are placed over the pre-operative x-rays. The templates are corrected for the magnification that can occur when the x-ray is taken. By comparing a variety of template sizes and shapes, the surgeon can get a strong suggestion of the implant that is needed.

The final determination of size is made at surgery. The size and shape of the bones are measured during the surgical procedure and from these measurements the surgeon can judge how much bone to remove. The manufacturers of the implants have also provided us with a series of trial prostheses. The surgeon can place the trial components on the bone and assess for proper fit and soft tissue balance. At that point small changes to the bony cuts can be made, if necessary, and soft tissue releases performed to assure that the implants fit well and that the soft tissue (the capsular sleeve) is well balanced. Finally, permanent implants the same size as the appropriate trial implants are chosen, and these are then affixed to the bone ends.

Unique prosthesis templating at HSS

Pre-operative templating at HSS is now possible electronically. Using the digital images from the PACS radiology system with digitized templates, the surgeon can assess implant sizes and perform a computer simulation of the insertion of the prosthesis. The surgeon can assess effects of changing implant sizes, changing implant designs (posterior stabilized vs. posterior cruciate ligament retaining prostheses), and even implants from different manufacturers.

Because of the large volume of total knee replacement procedures performed (the largest of any hospital in the world), we have the availability of multiple sizes and manufacturers usually readily available. By this pre-operative templating we can identify in advance which will require a specially-sized - or even a custom – implant, and these can then be fabricated by the manufacturer. The biomechanics department of HSS has been a leader in helping to design such custom implants for the use of our patients.

Conclusion

At the end of the day, our goal is the have the proper prosthesis for the patient so as to optimize the results. Total knee replacement has been, and continues to be, one of the most successful operations in the history of orthopedic surgery, relieving pain and increasing the ability of the patient to participate in more normal activities of daily living.

Reviewed by Steven B. Haas, MD, MPH

^ Back to Top

Newsroom

Request an Appointment