Pulmonary Artery Versus Central Venous Catheter Monitoring in the Outcome of Patients Undergoing Bilateral Total Knee Replacement

Kethy M. Jules-Elysee, MD
Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery
Weill Medical College of Cornell University


Jacques T. YaDeau, MD, PhD
Hospital for Special Surgery
Weill Medical College of Cornell University


Michael K. Urban, MD, PhD
Hospital for Special Surgery
Weill Medical College of Cornell University


Abstract
Bilateral total knee replacement (BTKR) has been associated with a higher incidence of fat embolism (FES) compared to single knee replacement. Consequently, intraoperative monitoring with a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) has been recommended. This study compares clinical outcome in BTKR patients monitored with central venous pressure versus PAC. A retrospective chart review of 249 consecutive patients undergoing BTKR, 132 of whom had PAC insertion versus 117 who had central line insertion, over a 1-year period were included in the study. Their medical records were reviewed for co-morbidities, baseline characteristics, and type of intraoperative monitoring. Need and duration for postoperative monitoring in the postoperative care, length of hospital stay (LOHS), signs of fat embolism, development of arrhythmias, and respiratory failure were all outcome measures. A total of four patients (1.6%) had FES as per Schonfeld criteria. One of these patients died within 48 h of surgery. They all had PAC monitoring intraoperatively. Pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) remained unchanged during surgery which raises doubt as to the clinical utility and advisability of the use of PACís in this setting. There was no statistically significant difference in cardiac or pulmonary complications, or LOHS between the two groups. Central venous pressure monitoring appears to be sufficient in patients undergoing BTKR.

This study was funded by the Department of Anesthesiology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY.

Ethical Board Review statement: the hospital institutional review board approved this human study and the study was performed according to ethical principles of research.

Level III: Retrospective Case Controlled Study.

This Article appears in HSS Journal: Volume 5, Number 1.
View the full article at springerlink.com.

About the HSS Journal
HSS Journal, an academic peer-reviewed journal, is published twice a year, February and September, and features articles by internal faculty and HSS alumni that present current research and clinical work in the field of musculoskeletal medicine performed at HSS, including research articles, surgical procedures, and case reports.

^ Back to Top
Request an Appointment